No Laughing Matter
by Sam Denoff
Okay. I’ve been asked to write a piece called Changes in
Comedy, Then and Now. I didn’t like that title. So I changed it. I can do
that. I’m in charge. I own the computer and the paper and the printer. And
since I am the creator of this opus I should be in charge. I mean, that’s the
way it should work. Well, at least that’s the way it used to work.
Aye...there’s the rub. Ah yes, Shakespeare. Isn’t it great that our friend
Willy is once again a big hit. A pretty funny guy when he wanted to be. However,
I digress. But then, I always do.
At the outset let me assure that the following are not the
ravings of an unhappy, non-working aging scribe. I am aging, quite gracefully, I
might add, but I am working quite a lot and being paid handsomely for my
scribbling. I have all the money I need unless I have to buy something. However
I must confess that I am unhappy.
I am unhappy about what passes for comedy that we see on
the screen today. The small screen to be precise. The process that takes one’s
idea from concept to script to the television screen has changed so drastically
that the creator is now, too often, just a highly paid stenographer.
There are dozens of brilliantly talented and funny young
writers today who, I believe, given the chance, would give us shows of great
quality and humor. When Bill Persky and I started out we were allowed to execute
our ideas the way we conceived them. We worked, at first, under the tutelage of
geniuses like Carl Reiner and Sheldon Leonard who insisted that we do it our
way. That’s the way they learned how to do it from people like Jack Benny and
Sid Caesar. Carl and Sheldon were gleefully passing the baton to us.
It no longer works that way. Have you recently been on the
set of a situation comedy on the day of a cast reading or a run-through? It’s
an awful spectacle. Literally dozens of people from the production company and
the network converge on the stage like killer bees, buzzing with the expectation
that they will take one look at the show and FIX IT! The fact that it may not
need fixing is irrelevant. These people, who have never written a script or
produced or directed anything besides traffic, are endowed by their superiors
with the power to turn witty and intelligent ideas into half-hours filled with a
mindless barrage of pointless jokes.
The Seinfeld show was hyped as being “about nothing.”
That was not true; it was about friendship! Four people who loved each other and
felt responsibility for each other’s welfare. That’s what made it work. Oh
yes, and it was very funny. Most of what we see now is really about nothing.
A network recently announced the development of a new
comedy that is so “out there” that if it were a feature film it would get an
“R” rating. It’s going to use language, including George Carlin’s famous
seven words, that has never before been heard on network television. It’s
really going to “push the envelope,” they said. Well, without even seeing it
I suggest they put it IN the envelope and send it really “out there” on the
next mission to Mars. I have it on good authority that Martians would say that!
That really is the essence between then and now. Shows
stayed on the air for years without once resorting to the use of blue material
to get a laugh. Granted, we weren’t allowed to.
That was good because we were forced to actually be creative rather than
going for the dirty joke. Today the producers are urged to fill their scripts
with smarmy, sophomoric jokes using the euphemism of the day for all the private
body parts as well as all the bodily functions, either done alone or with some
other animal regardless of whether it has two legs or four. They feel that this
will be appealing to the targeted demographic...young adults. So far it hasn’t
worked very well. On the whole, the ratings are dreadful and shares are at an
all-time low. Instead of just good story-telling, they use another device to try
to grab the audience. At least once a season a series will do an episode on a
subject like abortion, breast cancer, rape or the ever-popular drug addiction.
Those are all fine for the dramas but not great stuff for comedy, folks!
I hope you’ve noticed that I have not raised my voice
once during this discussion. That is unusual because I am very passionate about
this subject. I love this business and I hate seeing it being dumbed down to
near extinction. I swear, I was just interrupted in my typing by a close friend
who is some thirty years my junior. He is a bright, talented writer/producer. He
informed me that his latest pilot script was turned down because the star
attached was in her fifties! I have read the script. It is terrific. It is
bright, well-plotted, and very funny... grown-up funny and perfectly suited for
the star’s talents. So, here is a guy who has executive produced several top
network scenes, not yet forty, who is beginning to feel he is out of the loop.
What the hell is going on here? Now I’m shouting. This is the kind of guy who
gives us good, solid, funny stuff and they don’t want him to do what he does
best. Instead they want a lot of attractive single people with only one purpose
in mind... looking to get laid. Hey, so am I, but it’s not funny.
Back to the original topic... Changes in Comedy, Then and
Now.
It was better! But don’t give up
Sam
Denoff is the one you’ve heard about who writes clean and funny.